/wp-content/uploads/page-bg-internal.jpg
Our Work

Recommendations: Institution-Wide Dynamics and Resources

Recommendation 10. The institution empowers undergraduate students, graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and staff to voice safety questions and concerns to their faculty supervisors, EH&S offices, and/or safety committee.

Tools for Recommendation 10

  • Empowered Students and Postdocs Drive Lab Safety
    Available at Science Magazine.
    Description of how the University of Minnesota is empowering students to be involved in laboratory safety.
  • McGarry, K. A., Hurley, K. R., Volp, K. A., Hill, I. M., Merritt, B. A., Peterson, K. L., … & Tolman, W. B. (2013). Student Involvement in Improving the Culture of Safety in Academic Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(11), 1414-1417.
    Available at Journal of Chemical Education.
    A more in depth analysis of how the University of Minnesota empowered students.
  • Dupont’s Safety Training Observation Program (STOP)
    Available at Dupont.
    Provides a path to workplace safety by making safe behavior and workplace conditions part of the work culture.
  • OSHA provides guidance on how employees can be involved in safety.
    Available at OSHA.
  • From Safe Science: Promoting a Culture of Safety in Academic Chemical Research (NRC, 2014)
    • Conclusion 4: There are several key attributes related to research group dynamics that contribute to the advancement of the laboratory safety culture. A strong, positive safety culture empowers student and research trainees to have a “voice” and maintain an environment that encourages raising safety concerns freely without fear of repercussions.

<Previous Recommendation / Next recommendation>

Return to all recommendations